Curated Engineering Evaluation

Intent: Fatigue crack growth resistance and fracture toughness (tension applications) vs peak static compressive and tensile yield strength.

Engineering Verdict & When to Choose Each

2024 or 7075: specify the failure mode and evidence

By Mat Grades Editorial Desk · Updated 2026-11-14

Both alloys deserve a condition-specific review in demanding structural applications. Select by the relevant strength, fatigue, toughness and corrosion requirements rather than assuming that the highest tensile figure wins. The alloy number without temper, product form and direction is an incomplete design input.

For a thin load-carrying plate, establish the stress spectrum, notch details and inspection approach. Compare source evidence for the actual thickness and orientation. A small coupon result in a different condition is not sufficient support for a critical component.

Manufacturing can decide the practical route. Discuss material removal, residual-stress movement, fastening and surface protection with the supplier and machine shop. A prototype should include the final finish and the difficult geometry. Keep the approved source and condition with the design record so that a later substitution is reviewed against the evidence that justified the original selection.

2024 Aluminum: evidence to check

2024 Aluminum has 29 cataloged property rows. Modulus of Elasticity is reported as 73 GPa (typical; further condition not stated). Electrical Conductivity is reported as 50 % IACS (typical; O Temper). The record identifies ASTM B209 for Sheet & Plate; check its scope and ordered edition. These are source-scoped examples rather than unrestricted design allowables. Read the full row context and certificate before using a value for acceptance; an absent value is not zero or a performance failure.

7075 Aluminum: evidence to check

7075 Aluminum has 29 cataloged property rows. Modulus of Elasticity is reported as 72 GPa (typical; further condition not stated). Electrical Conductivity is reported as 45 % IACS (typical; O Temper). The record identifies ASTM B209 for Sheet & Plate; check its scope and ordered edition. These are source-scoped examples rather than unrestricted design allowables. Read the full row context and certificate before using a value for acceptance; an absent value is not zero or a performance failure.

Four questions before approval

  • Which failure mode and load spectrum control the part?
  • Are temper, thickness and direction comparable?
  • Is the required fatigue or toughness evidence available?
  • Does the trial include the final protective finish?

Check the linked material records for the complete source trail. Read the methodology before comparing minimum requirements with typical measurements. No direct substitution or qualified fabrication procedure is implied.

Material Comparison

Compare verified engineering materials side by side with condition-specific mechanical properties.

PDFExcel
Material A (Baseline)
Material B (Comparison)
1. Identity, Classification & Standards
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Parameter2024 Aluminum7075 Aluminum
Material FamilyAluminum & Aluminum AlloysAluminum & Aluminum Alloys
SubfamilyWrought Aluminum AlloysWrought Aluminum Alloys
AA Designation20247075
UNS DesignationA92024A97075
ISO DesignationAlCu4Mg1AlZn5.5MgCu
2. Chemical Composition Limits (wt %)Source-specific limits and typical values
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Element2024 Aluminum7075 Aluminum
Si (Silicon)≤ 0.5%≤ 0.4%
Fe (Iron)≤ 0.5%≤ 0.5%
Cu (Copper)3.8 – 4.9%1.2 – 2%
Mn (Manganese)0.3 – 0.9%≤ 0.3%
Mg (Magnesium)1.2 – 1.8%2.1 – 2.9%
Cr (Chromium)≤ 0.1%0.18 – 0.28%
Zn (Zinc)≤ 0.25%5.1 – 6.1%
Ti (Titanium)≤ 0.15%≤ 0.2%
OE (Other Elements Each)OE: ≤ 0.05% eachOE: ≤ 0.05% each
OT (Other Elements Total)≤ 0.15%≤ 0.15%
Al (Aluminum)——
3. Physical Properties
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Property2024 Aluminum7075 Aluminum
Density · TYPICALUnit: g/cm³2.77 g/cm³2.8 g/cm³
4. Contextual Mechanical PropertiesUnit: SI
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Mechanical Parameter2024 AluminumO7075 AluminumO
Modulus of Elasticity · TYPICALUnit: GPa73 GPa72 GPa
Ultimate Tensile Strength · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICALUnit: MPa186 MPa228 MPa
Yield Strength (0.2% Offset) · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICALUnit: MPa76 MPa103 MPa
Elongation (4D) · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICALUnit: %20 %17 %
Shear Strength · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICALUnit: MPa124 MPa152 MPa
Fatigue Endurance Limit (5x10^8 cycles) · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICALUnit: MPa90 MPa117 MPa
5. Electrical & Thermal Conductive Properties
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Property2024 Aluminum7075 Aluminum
Electrical Conductivity · O Temper · TYPICALCategory: ELECTRICAL • Unit: % IACS50 % IACS45 % IACS
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: µm/(m·K)23.2 µm/(m·K)23.4 µm/(m·K)
Solidus Temperature · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: °C502 °C532 °C
Liquidus Temperature · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: °C638 °C635 °C
Thermal Conductivity · O Temper · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: W/(m·K)190 W/(m·K)173 W/(m·K)
6. Hardness Evaluation (Discrete Scales Preserved)No cross-scale mathematical conversion
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Hardness Scale2024 Aluminum7075 Aluminum
HB Hardness · Cold Finished Rod & Bar · O Temper · TYPICAL47 HB60 HB