Curated Engineering Evaluation

Intent: Cast bronze bearing selection: anti-friction sleeve bearing bronze (SAE 660) versus high-strength aluminum bronze (9C) for heavy load and wear components.

Engineering Verdict & When to Choose Each

Bearing bronze or aluminum bronze: approve the bearing system

By Mat Grades Editorial Desk · Updated 2026-11-14

For a bushing, compare the load, motion, shaft surface and lubrication before comparing alloy hardness. C93200 and C95400 are different bronze candidates with different selection considerations. A stronger or harder replacement does not automatically reduce system wear.

Inspect the failed assembly before changing material. Edge loading, contamination, an unsuitable shaft finish or poor lubricant supply can dominate the result. A replacement that moves wear from the bushing to the shaft may increase the total repair cost even if the bushing itself lasts longer.

Obtain supplier guidance for the actual bearing duty and validate the assembled pair where the consequence of failure warrants it. Keep any load-speed limitation tied to the source and operating assumptions; do not calculate an allowable bearing duty from tensile strength alone. Quote the finished bore, lubrication features and inspection requirement together with the exact alloy and manufacturing route.

C93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660): evidence to check

C93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660) has 20 cataloged property rows. Electrical Conductivity is reported as 12 % IACS (typical; tested at 20 °C). Modulus of Elasticity (Tension) is reported as 100 GPa (typical; further condition not stated). The record identifies SAE J461; check its scope and ordered edition. These are source-scoped examples rather than unrestricted design allowables. Read the full row context and certificate before using a value for acceptance; an absent value is not zero or a performance failure.

C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C: evidence to check

C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C has 44 cataloged property rows. Electrical Conductivity is reported as 13 % IACS (typical; tested at 20 °C). Modulus of Elasticity (Tension) is reported as 106.9 GPa (typical; further condition not stated). The record identifies SAE J461; check its scope and ordered edition. These are source-scoped examples rather than unrestricted design allowables. Read the full row context and certificate before using a value for acceptance; an absent value is not zero or a performance failure.

Four questions before approval

  • Are load, speed and motion type documented?
  • Has the shaft and failure pattern been inspected?
  • Does the lubricant reach the loaded contact?
  • Is supplier bearing guidance applicable to the actual duty?

Check the linked material records for the complete source trail. Read the methodology before comparing minimum requirements with typical measurements. No direct substitution or qualified fabrication procedure is implied.

Material Comparison

Compare verified engineering materials side by side with condition-specific mechanical properties.

PDFExcel
Material A (Baseline)
Material B (Comparison)
!
Temper & Metallurgical Context Qualification:The selected records contain different or missing source contexts. Values shown in separate rows are not directly matched. Typical and estimated values are not guaranteed minima; matching context alone does not establish interchangeability.
1. Identity, Classification & Standards
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
ParameterC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C
Material FamilyCopper AlloysCopper Alloys
SubfamilyBearing BronzeAluminum Bronze
UNS DesignationC93200C95400
COMMERCIAL DesignationSAE 660 Bearing BronzeAluminum Bronze 9C
CDA DesignationAlloy 932Alloy 954
SPECIFICATION DesignationSAE J461SAE J461
2. Chemical Composition Limits (wt %)Source-specific limits and typical values
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
ElementC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C
Cu (Copper)81 – 85%≥ 83%
Pb (Lead)6 – 8%—
Sn (Tin)6.3 – 7.5%—
Zn (Zinc)1 – 4%—
Fe (Iron)≤ 0.2%3 – 5%
P (Phosphorus)≤ 0.15%—
Ni (Nickel)≤ 1%≤ 1.5%
Al (Aluminum)≤ 0.005%10 – 11.5%
S (Sulfur)≤ 0.08%—
Sb (Antimony)≤ 0.35%—
Si (Silicon)≤ 0.005%—
Mn (Manganese)—≤ 0.5%
3. Physical Properties
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
PropertyC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C
Density · TYPICAL · 20 °CUnit: g/cm³8.913 g/cm³7.446 g/cm³
4. Contextual Mechanical PropertiesUnit: SI
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Mechanical ParameterC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)As Centrifugal Cast (M02)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9CAs Centrifugal Cast (M02)
Modulus of Elasticity (Tension) · TYPICALUnit: GPa100 GPa106.9 GPa
Machinability Rating · TYPICALUnit: %70 %60 %
Tensile Strength · As Centrifugal Cast · As Centrifugal Cast (M02) · TYPICAL · 20 °CUnit: MPa206.8 MPa517.1 MPa
Yield Strength (0.5% Ext) · As Centrifugal Cast · As Centrifugal Cast (M02) · TYPICAL · 20 °CUnit: MPa96.5 MPa206.8 MPa
Elongation · As Centrifugal Cast · As Centrifugal Cast (M02) · TYPICAL · 20 °CUnit: %15 %12 %
5. Electrical & Thermal Conductive Properties
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
PropertyC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C
Electrical Conductivity · TYPICAL · 20 °CCategory: ELECTRICAL • Unit: % IACS12 % IACS13 % IACS
Liquidus Temperature · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: °C976.7 °C1037.8 °C
Solidus Temperature · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: °C854.4 °C1026.7 °C
Thermal Conductivity · TYPICAL · 20 °CCategory: THERMAL • Unit: W/(m·K)58.15 W/(m·K)58.67 W/(m·K)
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) · TYPICALCategory: THERMAL • Unit: µm/(m·K)18 µm/(m·K)16.2 µm/(m·K)
Specific Heat Capacity · TYPICAL · 20 °CCategory: THERMAL • Unit: J/(kg·K)376.8 J/(kg·K)418.7 J/(kg·K)
Annealing Temperature Range · RANGECategory: THERMAL • Unit: °C— °C621.1–662.8 °C
6. Hardness Evaluation (Discrete Scales Preserved)No cross-scale mathematical conversion
Scroll horizontally for side-by-side comparison
Hardness ScaleC93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660)C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C
Brinell Hardness · As Centrifugal Cast · As Centrifugal Cast (M02) · TYPICAL—150 HB
7. Fabrication & Processing Comparison
C93200 Bearing Bronze (SAE 660) Characteristics:

Machinability: Machinability rating: 70% relative to free-cutting brass (C36000 = 100%).

Weldability: Soldering: Excellent; Brazing: Good; Oxyacetylene Welding: Not Recommended; Gas Shielded Arc Welding: Not Recommended; Coated Metal Arc Welding: Not Recommended

C95400 Aluminum Bronze 9C Characteristics:

Machinability: Machinability rating: 60% relative to free-cutting brass (C36000 = 100%).

Weldability: Soldering: Good; Brazing: Good; Oxyacetylene Welding: Not Recommended; Gas Shielded Arc Welding: Good; Coated Metal Arc Welding: Good

Heat Treatment & Annealing: Annealing temperature range: 621.1°C to 662.8°C (1150°F - 1225°F).